|
| |
http://www.computerworld.com/home/print.nsf/all/9803303D92
Tuition payments, in-house classes on decline, two new studies show
By Tim Ouellette
03/30/98 Training may be needed more than ever to keep scarce IT workers up-to-date on
technology changes.
But don't expect all employers to foot the bill.
In fact, more than half of large information technology organizations don't offer tuition
reimbursement or in-house training for IT workers, according to a new study by Meta Group,
Inc. in Stamford, Conn. (see chart). The numbers reflect a major drop from last year.
Another study, by Hay Group, Inc. in Philadelphia, produced similar results.
The cuts in training benefits to workers hurt retraining efforts worse than programs that
train new workers, said Kerriann Vogel, an analyst at Meta Group. Those are workers who
have been with a company for a few years and may need to update their certificates or
expertise in a particular skill or move to a new skill.
Still, ``people are willing to pay for their own training to get certified and get the
premiums paid for certain hot skills,'' Vogel said.
For example, Steven Jenkins, a programmer at a software house in Dallas, paid for his own
Windows NT training to get certified and help attract more work to the company, he said.
CORPORATE REASONS
Why do some companies make employees pony up their own training dollars? Many of them are
dipping into their training budgets to fund year 2000 and software rollout projects; some
are spending more money on salaries and bonuses to get pretrained workers; and at some
where jobs are unfilled because of the IT skills shortage, workers are tied to their desks
handling a heavier load.
And with a large chunk of training budgets in the hands of business units instead of
information systems, technical training can get shortchanged in the bargain.
Rather than building effective training programs, some corporate purchasing departments
often focus on getting the most training for the dollar, said Lynne Hambleton, manager of
learning systems at Xerox Corp. in Rochester, N.Y.
``They need to look at it from a value-add to find out if workers could come out more
independent and valuable as a result of the training,'' Hamble-ton said.
But companies that skimp on training may pay for it in the long run.
``Training is a top retention vehicle, and career development is the No. 1 stay item for
workers,'' said Linda Pittenger, a vice president and managing director of IT consulting
at Hay Group.
That means companies that focus on reskilling are keeping valuable people on staff for
future projects and attracting new workers, she added.P
SIDEBAR:
Tax code changes
Congress is taking steps to simplify the tax laws imposed on independent computer
consultants and to make it easier for companies to hire those people for time-critical and
short-staffed projects.
A spokesman for Sen. Connie Mack, R-Fla., last week confirmed that the senator is prepping
legislation to repeal Section 1706 of the tax code.
Section 1706 requires that computer professionals fulfill a series of ambiguous rules
before they can be classified as independent contractors. That leaves workers and
companies open to audit by the Internal Revenue Service and additional taxes if the IRS
determines that the contractor is actually a full employee.
``With today's skills shortage, it is more critical to remove Section 1706,'' said Paul
Kostek, president of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. ``It will
clarify everyone's role, because currently it can be a pain for individuals and the
companies to manage independent contractors because of all the restrictions.''
Industry groups have fought the provision since it was introduced in the 1986 tax
legislation, said Max Steiner, spokesman for the National Association of Computer
Consultant Businesses, based in Greensboro, N.C.
If successful, the repeal would free up more consultants to work independently. It also
might make businesses more interested in hiring consultants to alleviate their IT staffing
shortages, Steiner added.
|